On 3/15/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bruce,
Please see below:
Draft Policy(?):
http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html
Thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=115669727800005&r=1&w=2
First email:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=incubator-general&m=115669716709268&w=2
Please read this email:
http://marc.info/?l=incubator-general&m=112355163632367&w=2
In this thread:
http://marc.info/?t=112326559200004&r=1&w=2
Thanks, Dims. This info is exactly what I needed.
After reading through the entire Thread, I am of the same opinion.
However, the message that completely, utterly threw me was Noel's
message stating:
'As I said, it is about balance. The community that we most care about
during Incubation is the developer community, not the end-user community. I
could go so far as to say that a bit of inconvenience for end-users is not a
bad thing because we don't want *widespread* adoption by end-users until the
project completes Incubation. And we certainly want end-users to know what
they are getting into if/when they choose to adopt a project in the
Incubator.'
So I looked back at the Incubator exit criteria and one of the
criteria to graduation is:
'Demonstrate an active and diverse development community'
Where does this leave a project that enters to the Incubator with a
user community already? Further, where does this leave a project that
has been in the Incubator long enough to have developed a user
community?
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Castor - http://castor.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
