Bozhong Lin wrote:
> we would like to cut 2.0 release sooner without fully passing
> JAX-WS TCK, and plan to push JAX-WS TCK test into 2.1 release
> plan. Of course, in CXF 2.0 release note, we will explicitly
> mention that Apache CXF does NOT claim any JAX-WS compliant
> yet, like what we did with CXF 2.0 M1 release.
> Is this plan OK to incubator PPMC from legal standpoint?
>From a legal standpoint, it should probably be run through legal. I haven't
seen the TCK license for JAX-WS TCK, but does it contain language that
prohibits use of the package namespace until the TCK is passed?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
