Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> 
> On Dec 7, 2006, at 12:46 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> 
>>> There was a question raised by Greg Stein about a better template for
>>> board resolution, but since no alternative template has been made
>>> available, we are sticking with what we have.
>>
>> I suggest you change all "Apache Cayenne PMC" references to "Apache
>> Cayenne Project" in that resolution (and maybe it will help the next
>> podling).
>  
> Well, I didn't want to make a change during the vote as this is not  as
> simple as search and replace. It looks like this is something that  will
> require more consideration going forward.
> 
> In fact the way it is worded, most references to the PMC are correct. 
> E.g. "members of the PMC" or "Apache Cayenne PMC [..] is tasked with 
> the migration [...] of the incubating Apache Cayenne project".  Actually
> I think the only place where the change might make sense is  in the
> second paragraph that now states something like:
> 
> "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee 
> (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Cayenne PMC", be and hereby is 
> established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation".

good catch. You're right, of course -- I was moving too quickly and
dispensing bum advice.

> But even here, instead of replacing PMC with Project, I think we  simply
> need to add a sentence about establishing a project (as PMC  also has be
> established).
> 
> Comments?

I think that the reference in the second paragraph can be changed to
"Apache Cayenne Project" because the following paragraph introduces the
PMC as the responsible entity.

 -jean


> Andrus
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to