On 11/10/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we go the first route, then we should treat this list as an announcements list. Results of votes for releases and graduation are posted here, and incubator PMC members will be given 72 hours to raise an issue.
I've been advising podlings with three mentors to conduct release votes on their dev list, but ping the mentors beforehand to make sure they vote. Then, having three PMC +1s, they should forward the vote results from their dev list to this list to allow the rest of the PMC 72 hours to raise any concerns. If no response, the release goes out based on the earlier three PMC votes. If one of the mentors doesn't want to +1 it, that's a problem that should be discussed in any case. If a mentor doesn't have time to review the occasional release of their podling, they probably shouldn't be a mentor. I prefer to keep the release vote on the podling's dev list where their community lives; I also prefer to reduce the noise on this list for uneventful project-specific release votes.
If we go the second route, then we need to set the expectation that most PMC members participate in most votes.
I don't think this is ever going to happen. I sure hope no one on the PMC votes for the release of a product they haven't taken a close look at (not making technical judgements, but everything else). And I really doubt, with the number of podlings that the average PMC member will have time to do this in most cases --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]