On 10/27/06, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kelvin,
The release includes the license and notice files but I don't see any
file pointing out the licenses of the individual jar files included
in the release.
The notice file is some what ambiguous on what is included under
which license. It refers to the EPL and CPL (both are fine AFAIKT
from [1]). But it seems like the notices of which jar is licensed
under which license should be more explicit [2].
yeh - ATM they are ok but could be improved.
the general idea is to help out downstream repackagers and users by
clearing indicating the licenses for each component in one place. for
example, http://incubator.apache.org/guides/examples/LICENSE is better
since it makes it easy to work out which license applies to which jar.
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
