Robert,
the aRAT tool is indeed very helpful.
As a side note: would you consider to commit the attached patch?
I think it would make life easier to many since the String.contains(...)
method is deprecated in recent JDK versions.
Thanks,
Jacopo
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Other than wait for Robert's scanning tool? :-)
no need to wait: get the source (http://code.google.com/p/arat/) and
run the RAT against the source distribution (i'll improved binary will
come later). the output is very unfriendly but what do you expect from
aRAT ;-)
some knowledge and judgement is needed to interpret the output. more
work is needed for stuff i have to check manual ATM but the vast
majority of my blockers (as opposed to stylist feedback) are found by
RAT.
if anyone wants to have a hack then let me know...
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: src/java/rat/license/standard/W3CLicense.java
===================================================================
--- src/java/rat/license/standard/W3CLicense.java (revision 19)
+++ src/java/rat/license/standard/W3CLicense.java (working copy)
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
public ILicense match(String line) {
ILicense result = null;
- if (line != null && line.contains(COPYRIGHT_URL)) {
+ if (line != null && line.indexOf(COPYRIGHT_URL) != -1) {
result = this;
}
return result;
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
