Mark Little wrote:
> So let's try to take this to some "logical" conclusion: you're saying
> that just because person A says something that person B disagrees
> with, person B should then accept that because person A is somehow
> more experienced?
No and hell no. "Because I said so" doesn't cut it anymore today than it
did when I was 5. Technicalities aside (ignore the binding votes issue),
we're all peers in a community. Ideas and action should be the tokens of
value, not authority. For the Nth time today, our goal is consensus. Votes
should be a celebration (ratification) of a consensus, not the tool (and a
poor one at that) to make one.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
