-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark Little wrote: > >>> Is random denial of initial commiters typical? >> Not at all, in fact I'm confident that's never ever happened. The >> assertion that this decision is "random" is a little offensive. > > No offense meant, but given the blackbox approach, what else could > one infer from this?!
You will, of course, infer and interpret events as you choose. It's pretty obvious to me, a complete outsider, that there was nothing 'random' about this at all. > Sorry, but being strung along for the past 2 months on one set of > assumptions only to be presented with a fait accomplit, I'm not in > the mood to give the benefit of the doubt. A "careful decision" would > be one based on all of the facts and arrived at by consultation with > all of the parties involved. Again, you will draw your own conclusions. Of course, your remark assumes that 'all the facts' are generally and publicly available, and 'all the parties involved' are equally well-advertised. *My* inference and interpretation is that there is absolutely no/zero/nada institutional malice involved. - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRSQzx5rNPMCpn3XdAQIwlQP9EfXNG+Db3YcUAFCinsD+RKxLbdLQCBrW mzOliAAxhyUoIsii5SIscCgJloW3IbvoPonjjGEUtTmYuPCCR7YOD6cjofUlUMli S4T4CwvkIjN9fHvVy1ZY2OGAsFlnPJtdE8JGzg82xVRVrerbIW+4HFQDz/IG9hoL jB5o3eZBEZc= =snfD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
