Damn, and I was going to give it +1. UIMA folks answered questions about what it is that UIMA really does in emails, but yes, making sure it's answered in the proposal (I can't connect to wiki.apache.org at the moment to see the final proposal for myself).
Otis ----- Original Message ---- From: Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:11:13 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] accept UIMA as a podling On 9/18/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ ] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling > [ ] 0 Don't care > [X] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason: I'm sorry, but I have to vote -1 based on my new policy of rejecting any potential podling that can't explain what it is that they do within the first paragraph of the proposal. I'm a fairly intelligent person, but honestly I have no clue what "an architecture and software framework for creating, discovering, composing and deploying a broad range of multi-modal analysis capabilities" actually is, and I see little potential for any project that's so bad at selling themselves to actually grow a useful community. Additionally, I believe we decided that having the final vote thread point to a Wiki page was a bad idea. It would be good to resend this with the actual proposal content inline so everyone can be sure what they're actually voting on. -garrett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
