Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On 9/13/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> however IMO the IP clearance document should still be created and >> committed so that it's easy to track the origins of the code. >> questions about provinence can sometimes be raised years later and it >> has sometimes proved difficult to track down old email discussions. >> the document should be trivial but at least it'll be in the right >> place in case anyone needs it down the line. > > > Here's another case where I'm not seeing the IP clearance form either > on our site. > > Was the Graffito clearance only faxed to Jim? -- justin >
Yes, I was not even aware of an IP form when this was done (I would guess it probably didn't exist at that time). The external base code was a simple software grant from a single vendor. Everything else has been developed in SVN by existing committers. -- Raphaël Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Portals - Enterprise Portal in Java http://portals.apache.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
