On 9/15/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/14/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/14/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/14/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

<snip>

> > If this was not the case
> > then every artifact in the maven repo would need to be signed and that
> > seems like a bit of overkill.
>
> the policy is clear - they must be signed. this might seem like
> overkill until you consider the cost to your personal reputation if an
> unsigned jar is substituted by malware. signing by release managers is
> an easy and effective protection which is why infrastructure insists
> upon it. in the (hopefully unlikely) event of a compromise, it is much
> easier and quicker for a release manager to verify that the signature
> is still valid than to recut the release.
>

Does anybody know if there is a way to get maven to sign every
artifact that get deployed?  As far as I know that does not exist yet.

the last i heard it is planned but is currently stalled, waiting on
the completion of a signing utility. maybe someone who knows more
might like to jump in about now...

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to