On 8/25/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... Wicket *is* different.
Excellent. Thanks a bunch for the thorough reply and comparison points. Very helpful.
Whether this is the right way to do things is debatable, but I would say now is not the right time for the incubator to start having those kinds of debates.
I'm not trying to start a debate, nor engaging in any debate. I offered my opinion. The model sounds cool, but I don't happen to like it. I am fine explaining offlist cuz it really is irrelevant here, as you note.
Various ASF members like working this way, are working this way, and are backing this proposal. Trust darwinism.
More power to 'em. I get a vote just like any other Incubator PMC member. Please don't attempt to deny me that. Just because I didn't +1 the proposal doesn't mean you should try to coerce me into changing my vote. Darwin also says that proposals could be voted down :-) (but I'm not even doing that... it's just a -0 for cryin' out loud) To be honest, I am rather amazed at the amount of text written because one single person votes -0 rather than +1. Seriously... wow. God forbid somebody votes -1. What happens then? Ten times as many words written to convince them of the error of their ways? What are we saying to people: don't vote anything but +1 or your inbox will get slammed? Follow the groupmind, or you shall be mailbombed? Personally, I'd prefer an environment MUCH more accepting of alternate votes -- that means you'll actually *get* those votes, rather than people being quiet, too afraid to counter the majority. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
