I placed company names after names, as the last proposal to get voted on
did not
have company names on it and was requested to add company names. Nothing
more than that.
Carl.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 8/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's not complicated, folks. ASF projects consist of individuals.
Adding
company affiliations after each of the initial committers names
suggests, to
some, that the day they move on to another company their contribution
to the
project ends. We understand why Cliff did so for himself (so that
there would
be no misunderstanding that he has a vested interest, bravo), but
that this
was propagated to the entire initial list of committers is very
troubling.
No, including the affiliations is standard practice. This is the only
way we can judge the diversity of the proposal. If it's just names of
folks off the street and everyone works at the same company (and that
isn't disclosed), we have no way of estimating the true diversity of
the project. -- justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
