Does anyone have any further concerns about this proposal?
- I think Glasgow is fine since it appears not to conflict with any registered software marks. I don't think we need to be worried about the university reference, and we obviously have several projects already named for cities. I'm also not worried about any company's old unregistered code names. - There was also the question about how the AMQP specification will be handled and licensed. I started this thread with my feelings about that aspect (short version: it looks better than some other currently incubating projects, but I'd like us to come up with guidelines about what is acceptable at Apache, and then make sure this project adheres to those guidelines before graduating from the incubator). As the champion for the project, I'll start a vote for this unless I hear unresolved concerns in the next 48 hours or so. I'll also make sure the wiki is updated, if necessary, before calling the vote. Cliff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
