+1 from me as well. Congrats! Sanjiva.
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 08:55 +0100, ant elder wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > All the packaging etc of this release looks ok to me (though I still can't > get the web service sample to work, I'll raise a JIRA about that). > > This vote has been going a week now, could any more of you with binding > votes spare a bit of time to review and vote on the release? > > ...ant > > On 7/25/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 7/21/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > We have held a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a release of > > > the Tuscany C++ implementation. The vote email thread is available here: > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg05134.html > > > <http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg05134.html+> > > > > > > In summary we have 4 +1 votes from committers and no 0s or -1s. > > > > > > i've never cut C++ releases - and having read about your battles, i'm now > > glad about that. hopefully some release managers more expert in C++ will > > jump and take a look... > > > > once you've smoothed out the process, it'd be great if you could > > contribute > > some patches to the incubator release guide covering C++ specific release > > issues and tips. > > > > We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release this > > > version. > > > > > > The candidate distribution is available here: > > > http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/RC-3b/ > > > > > > +1 > > > > there are a small number of documents that would probably be better with > > license headers and several blank documents (which i suspect were > > generated > > by autoconf) but otherwise no nits i can find. > > > > - robert > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
