sorry posted the wrong email :-/ On 7/23/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/23/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > > > > no change is necessary - the current policy is sufficient. > > > Well, no, the expectation is clearly being ... > > I agree with Roy. I'm not sure if he and I yet agree or disagree on > what > the policy should be, but there are clearly conflicting views and > "traditions" in place. So we should formally (re?)establish the > consensus > by vote, and then make sure that what we have written everywhere is in > line > with that consensus. let's be honest - the policy document is a mess. i can't even get 3 +1's to remove commented out material from the policy document.
given that we wouldn't be changing the current policy, wouldn't it be cleaner and clearer just to pass a PMC resolution noting that the proposal has the final say? - robert
