On Jul 11, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I guess the bigger question is whether we ought to change the
72 hour guideline for the foundation as a whole, or make
incuabator votes a clearly noted exception.
We should use our judgment to ensure a collaborative environment
without
undue overhead. But it would be unfair, for example, to
deliberately hold a
vote when someone whom you know is opposed is going to be off-line.
I was just asking the question, since a number of people seemed put
out by the
72 hour limit. I would say that if people are deliberately holding
votes to exclude
people with opposing opinions we have bigger problems than whether or
not we
have a hard limit on vote durations.
Ted
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
