On 7/4/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Irving, Dave wrote: >> So, my proposal is, how about we start creating module(s) in >> MINA for protocols? >> > > Of course, Im biased - but It would be a shame if we re-wrote http > support on top of Mina over again, when we have asyncweb already :o) > We were originally going to make asyncweb a subproject of mina, but at > the time it was decided it would be cleaner to keep it as a separate > project. Right, it certainly would be a shame. Interested in bringing AsyncWeb over here? :)
Bringing in AsyncWeb and other possible future contributions will make this project quite too big to fit into a subproject. We might need an incubation process to find a better place for MINA eventually. Any idea? I will CC this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think that if it lived w/MINA, it might get more help staying up-to-
date with our API changes.
I agree with you. :) Cheers, Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
