"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to hear from the people who ostensibly make up the fledgling Kabuki community. But its development should have no reflection on any other project. Oh yeah...Is there anybody from Kabuki that would respond? The dead silence since Kabuki was accepted into Apache is concerning. It looks like that the companies that initiatied Kabuki have no real interest in getting the project going on at Apache. There is going to be a session at Apache EU on Kabuki by Scott Dietzen - can somebody ask him? Sam Ruby wrote: >I'm still willing to help with Kabuki, but Andy Clark knows those people >better. I've had occasional emails with a few others on that team.
Is there any info that you can share from these occasional emails? Martin Marinschek wrote: >I've let myself be added to the Kabuki team, to make sure I can help >out with downstream integration.I'm disappointed that I've not heard much >about it so >far though on the mailing lists. I'm subscribed to all of them, >and nothing but >wordless silence. Not good for an incubating project. In comparison, >ADF Faces incubation has started much later, and the mailing-lists are >already well used for user- and development discussions. I myself was trying to use Kabuki when it was initially accepted into Apache, but have been very disappointed ever since. It looks like that some company used Apache as a dumping ground? I am curious of how Apache Incubator works and whether there are rules (written rules or generally understood rules without being written down) governing issues like: 1. How a project can be accepted into Incubator; 2. How a project should be started once accepted (how soon, what kind of activity, etc). 3. What happens for situations like Kabuki? Should a project be removed from Apache? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
