+1 (binding) Paul
On 5/26/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks OK to me. +1 On May 25, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues > Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at > http://article.gmane.org/ > gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403 > > We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release > this new version. > The candidate distribution can be found at > http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/ > > Thanks > -- > Jeremy > > On 5/22/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> robert burrell donkin wrote: >> > On 5/19/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi! >> >> >> >> I have initiated a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a >> >> release of Tuscany. The vote email thread is available there: >> >> http://article.gmane.org/ >> gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3259 >> >> >> >> >> >> We have read the Apache release guidelines and the incubator >> release >> >> policy, but this is the first time that we are doing an incubation >> >> release so I would appreciate if you could take a look at the >> >> distributions at >> >> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/<http:// >> people.apache.org/%7Ejsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/>, >> >> >> >> give us >> >> feedback and let us know if we need to fix anything. >> > >> > >> > (non-binding) >> > >> > a few little nits (nothing serious, more FYI for next time): >> > >> > 1 there are some encoding issues down at the bottom of the >> > LICENSE.txt. they >> > don't effect the meaning. >> > 2 STATUS seems like it might be a little outdated re:PENDING >> ISSUES. >> > might >> > be good to list M1 in the release status >> > 3 MANIFEST files lack a Implementation-Vendor-Id and so are not >> fully >> > complient. it's conventional to use 'org.apache'. >> > >> > one slightly more serious point: >> > >> > 4 the tuscany jar's don't contain NOTICE files. all distributed >> artifacts >> > *must* contain these LICENSE and NOTICE files. if these jars don't >> > contain >> > these files then they cannot be released via the apache jar >> repository >> > (which is mirrored to the maven repository on ibiblio). read >> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html. it's traditional to include >> > LICENSE >> > and NOTICE files within META-INF (but that's not mandatory). >> > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html contains >> maven 1 >> > snippets. >> > >> > but overall not bad :-) >> > >> > - robert >> > >> Robert, >> >> Thanks for your feedback. I fixed the issues you reported (see JIRA >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-414) and uploaded the >> updated files to http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test- >> incubating-M1/. >> >> I also started a new vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish the >> updated distribution. The vote email thread is available there: >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/ >> 200605.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> -- >> Jean-Sebastien >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
