On May 4, 2006, at 5:57 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Can we elide the hyphen out of all of these? It seems like bad
form. This will be unbelievably frustrating when OpenEJB enters
incubation (very soon now). Since OpenEJB has been around for ever
and this project doesn't officially exist yet, how about we take
the opportunity to align the two names avoiding the confusion on
everone's part and make "Open JPA" into "OpenJPA" no space.
I can just see every article about EJB3 at Apache get one of the
two names, mailing list, or websites wrong.
It's ok, we can deal :) I've chatted with Patrick about it the past
as obviously I like OpenFOO as in Open{SSL,SSH,LDAP,EJB,JMS,ORB}
etc. His perspective was whatever the community wants is good with
him. I think that's a pretty reasonable stance so in that same
spirit, if Apache Open JPA is the cool new way to do acronyms, that's
fine with me.
-David
-dain
On May 1, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I created the lists for Open JPA :
open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
open-jpa-commits@incubator.apache.org
If you wish to subscribe to either, please send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
respectively and respond to the challenge message.
There is a basic STATUS file in place, and an entry in the project
list.
I've also created the SVN repo at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/open-jpa
and tested the commit mails.
We'll continue refining this tomorrow :)
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
