Hi Erik, Wiki: Done. I now have an account and did a quick test to edit the page. Everything works.
Lucene.Net History: Yes, the release of 1.3-rc3 as DotLucene was nothing but a re-packaging of what Pasha removed from SourceForge.net. Everything released after 1.3-rc3 was done by me from the ground up. I did not take anything from Pasha's 1.3-rc3 release other then examining it to fix some issues (primarily with the file StandardTokenizerTokenManager.java). Once I had my first 1.4 release, I never had to look back at 1.3's code base. I hope this helps, if not let me know. Regards, -- George -----Original Message----- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:06 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene.Net Yes, I added that wiki piece for Lucene.Net. Please refine it as desired. I'm not clear on your timeline below... when you re-released 1.3-rc3, that was with Pasha's codebase, right? And what about 1.4-alpha - was any of that code from Pasha, or was it a from-scratch creation by you? Erik On Apr 16, 2006, at 10:25 PM, George Aroush wrote: > Hi Noel, > > I see that Lucene.Net has already been updated > (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2006) possibly done by Erik. > > In regards to the history of Lucene.Net/DotLucene, here is how it > went: > May 2003: 1.3-rc1 was released by Pasha Bizhan > Dec 2003: 1.3-rc2 was released by Pasha Bizhan > Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 was released by Pasha Bizhan > Sep 2004: 1.3-rc3 went close source and all earlier releases were > removed > from SourceForge.net > Sep 2004: A new project called DotLucene was created on > SourceForge.net > Sep 2004: I re-released Lucene.Net 1.3-rc3 under the project name > DotLucene > on SourceForge.net > Oct 2004: 1.4-alpha of Lucene.Net was released by me > Nov 2004: 1.4-rc1 was released by me > Dec 2004: 1.4.3-beta was released by me > Jan 2005: 1.4.3-rc1 was released by me > Feb 2005: 1.4.3-final was released by me > May 2005: 1.9-beta was released by me > Feb 2006: 1.9-rc1 was released by me > > As for Dan's documentation, I agree with you -- his terms are not > in ASF > terms so I will say "no" to him. > > Regards, > > -- George > > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:31 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Lucene.Net > > George, > > Yes, a report needs to come from each project. You can see > examples in the > e-mail archives, or recent ones linked from > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FrontPage. > > If you wouldn't mind, I'd like to hear a bit of the history of > Lucene.Net. > It seems that there was Lucene.Net, then it forked with one version > becoming > DotLucene and another becoming closed source. The former is what > came to > here, according to the status file, but you seem to indicate that > not all of > the participants have come? > > I assume that when you refer to "a promotional website for > DotLucene set up > by it's owner, Dan Letecky" you mean that Dan Letecky owns the > site. :-) > > And I wouldn't be keen to accept his documentation under his terms. > > --- Noel > > -----Original Message----- > From: George Aroush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:07 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer > > > Hi Nole, > > Is the report for inclusion in this month something you need from > me? If > so, can you point me to what I need to report on, i.e.: any forms > that I > have to fill. > > The IP is cleaned up some time ago (as far as I know if not please > advice.) > At SourceForge.net Lucene.Net (which is known as DotLucene) will no > longer > be supported. Do I need to do anything at SourceForge.net beside the > announcement that DotLucene has moved to ASF? > > http://www.dotlucene.net/ is just a promotional website for > DotLucene set up > by it's owner, Dan Letecky. I sent an email to Dan asking if he > wants to > contribute his documentation of Lucene.Net to ASF (which is found > here: > http://www.dotlucene.net/documentation/) His response was: > > "I'm willing to contribute my documentation as long as there is a > link back > to http://www.dotlucene.net on each contributed page. E.g. > <p>Contributed by > <a href="http://www.dotlucene.net";>dotlucene.net</a>." > > I believe giving credit where it's due, but this maybe too much to > ask for. > In any case, I don't know ASF policy on this regards and if this is > acceptable. Please let me know, otherwise I will create and > maintain the > documentations myself. > > As for the earlier project going closed-source, that was the case > with 1.2. > However, since I have taken over stating with 1.3 and now that > Lucene.Net is > on ASF, I don't see it gong back to closed-source any more. > > Regards, > > -- George > > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:14 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Adding Jeff Roderburg to Lucene.Net as a committer > > Erik, > > I'll add a +1. And please be sure to submit the report for > inclusion this > month. > > For my information, I notice that the STATUS file says that this is > from the > DotLucene project on SourceForge. How are things going with IP > clearance? > And will this web site: http://www.dotlucene.net/ be coming over as > the > project's web site soon? > > I see that an earlier Lucence.Net project went closed-source > (http://searchblackbox.com/lucene/index.html?ldn2). The only issue > I have > with them at the moment is their implication that they are THE > Lucene for > .net, rather than just A compatible implementation. > > --- Noel > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
