Dims,

remember committing stuff is not the only way to be a
participant. I'm always scared of these kinds of metrics --
people tend to abuse them (not saying you are). As an example I
have not committed a single line of code to harmony but I think most
people would agree I am an active part of its community, perhaps even
enough to merit committership (if I wasn't a mentor nor ASF committer
nor incubator PMC member already).

LSD

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:23:24AM -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> What i'd be interested to know is how many of the 17 Non-Apache
> Committers noted on the proposal[1] got Apache id's and of them how
> many of them actually made any commits to the Apache SVN repo.
> 
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
> 
> On 3/14/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > David Jencks wrote:
> > >
> > > I think I'm seeing too much incipient dogmatism here.  A little while
> > > ago I remember reading about how it was possible for code to zip
> > > through the incubator on its way to become part of an existing
> > > project, resting only long enough for the legal/provenance questions
> > > to be resolved.  I think this is still a good path to keep open, and
> > > don't see the use of a PPMC for it.
> >
> > Except ActiveMQ isn't just code, it's code+people.  If all
> > the people are already associated with the ASF when the
> > podling enters incubation..  well, then why isn't it being
> > handled as a grant of code?  The need for a podling implies
> > the presence of people new to the ASF.
> >
> > > For instance, my understanding
> > > is that ActiveMQ is coming to be part of geronimo.
> >
> > Most likely, yes -- but it's not a certainty.  (Just close to
> > it.)  The eventual disposition is made at graduation.
> > - --
> > #ken    P-)}
> >
> > Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
> > Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/
> >
> > "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >
> > iQCVAwUBRBbFR5rNPMCpn3XdAQKqOAQAtm4gWzEgdP9FZKknZWVbszAbIBafgvvn
> > 4wfPatOdUpy577axawHnFDq3i6OG3poPqYn7OecqZkCXSimSIf3Hp7CsijzHnL/x
> > rsluUCyPkW11/zs/lvlkXhpIWjNmpTV0T4EkiadZfIPK704qUE3CHpkKT0uYS7lk
> > xsA1obdLoes=
> > =3klG
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to