On Sunday 19 February 2006 03:11, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Here's a good chance to review my involvment: > So what it comes down to what i am actually working on is as follows: > beehive, geronimo, gump, ws-all, security, ode
:o) I am *not* critical to *you* or how you distribute your volunteer effort, but to the process of "exclusion by default", which is something new to the Incubation policies. Dims, I think you are putting in a great effort at ASF, both in time, quality and diligence. And I only brought it up because I think "stretching oneself thin" will lead to a "smaller sum", and I would be disappointed to see that happen. > Now, If you are talking about who the initial committer set is going > to be for ode, Please take that discussion to the ode-dev. No, that is not part of my concerns. The details of Ode, I leave to the people who understand the technology and how it fits into various ASF projects. My Concern; Proposals in the past have always had a set of initial committers which equated (approx) the people that have developed the initial codebase, in for of OSS community or employees, plus ASF folks who are interested. *I* have not seen anyone highlighting that this has been a problem. Now, that is being changed for Ode, IMHO without much debate, and from my angle it *seems* that the *reason* is that 37 committers are listed, and considered not feasible. Cheers Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
