I don't see any further issues with the ActiveMQ M4 release. I think
we should we restart the release vote.
Regards,
Hiram
On Feb 8, 2006, at 2:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Noel,
I think that these issues have now been addressed. I have gathered
up the information from subsequent replies in this thread below.
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 1/31/2006 7:43 AM:
-1
* The paperwork has not been recorded by the ASF Secretary.
If necessary, an ASF Officer can be used as an
intermediary, e.g., if Ken wants to accept and ACK a FAX,
we can operate on his ACK.
I believe that these have been now sent and confirmed.
* I don't see a Software Grant for any of the code that came
over from codehaus.
I believe that these have been now sent and confirmed.
* I have no problem with the tarballs, but the plain jars do
not have the disclaimer associated with them.
Any current user of ActiveMQ will have to modify their Maven
project descriptor to change the groupId of activemq to incubator-
activemq, which should be an clear sign that project is
incubating. This is what was done for Derby and Geronimo.
* http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/ActiveMQ_Incubation is not
a substitute for http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
activemq.html.
I removed the confusing wiki pages. The incubator web pages have
been updated. I have added a STATUS file to the SVN repo.
Regards,
Alan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
