Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Mads Toftum wrote: > > > Whoa! so the workflow is tied to David watching for commits? > > > When someone said that at apachecon, I thought it was a joke - I'm > > > beginning to understand more and more of why people are annoyed. > > > > Why? The man has been tremendous about it. He publishes daily. And if you > > look at plans for site-dev, they don't involve people doing their own > > builds, they involve a build server. Right now, ours is called David. > > Anakia sites don't need a build server! I would never feel comfortable > about committing a change that I couldn't review myself. > > The fact that we have to rely on a human being means to me (and probably > where Mads is coming from) that the entire workflow is broken. -- justin
The workflow of Forrest is exactly the same as Anakia. There can be an additional build server for those who only want to make a quick content change. Imagine that only one committer ever manages to find the time to run the Anakia build command and then review and commit the changes. There would be the same holdup. Note that this seems to be the case for the top-level w.a.o/dev/ docs too. The problem seems to be that people don't want to install Forrest locally. There is me and looking at the commit archives i see that there have been some others recently. Yes agreed, the process is broken. -David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
