On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 12:47:51PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > if you look at plans for site-dev, they don't involve people doing > > > their own builds, they involve a build server. > > > Anakia sites don't need a build server! I would never feel comfortable > > about committing a change that I couldn't review myself. > > The site-build server would have to support review. That's mandatory. I > would like to be able to build sites locally, sure, but with dozens of ASF > sites, and too many different ways to build them ...
Ergh. I don't want a staging server at all! It's *massive* overkill and something I don't want to have any part of. A server that takes four+ hours for me to see its changes? Riiight. We need instant gratification. The way to solve the 'how do I build this?' for a project is to just do one Subversion checkout and then run build....just like Anakia does. I don't care what is behind the scenes as long as it works. -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
