Yes, I agree with Justin. More eyes the better. Especially ones with
"outsider" perspective will help.
-- dims
On 12/30/05, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 10:21:59AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> > Agreed, but the Tuscany proposal was an independent proposal, not
> > sponsored (at the time) by any PMC.
>
> Dims mentioned that they had planned to approve that proposal through the
> WS PMC - so if it had been sponsored by them, there would have been no
> change permitted by the Incubator PMC to address concerns like Roy's.
>
> > >The Incubator PMC
> > >should also be able to make a judgment ("certification"?) of the
> > >process proposed by the PMC - such as whether a code base should be
> > >under full incubation or just use the IP clearance form.
> > >
> > >I think that making it clear that the Incubator PMC can do this would
> > >go a long way to addressing some of the concerns already mentioned.
> >
> > Agreed - although in general, if a PMC just ignored the input of the
> > Incubator PMC on a PMCs suggested incubation, it's an indication of a
> > problem anyway...
>
> As Greg said, that's for the board to deal with. -- justin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
