On 12/24/05, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas Dudziak wrote: > > <snip/> > > If now for instance, the DB PMC would somehow automatically get the > > the incubation mails for the projects that it voted into incubation > > and its reports, oversight from this PMC might enhance. After all it > > involves more work to actively delete mails than to not get them in > > the first place. > > > > And thus potential problems with incubated problems would surface > > sooner, and the workload of the Incubator PMC might decrease - one > > individual PMC has only a few projects in incubation whereas the > > Incubator PMC has to take care of all incubated projects. > > > > Interesting idea. Now forced distribution of emails won't work IMO as > it's easy to delete without actually reading. So a way to ensure > oversight of the originating PMC it to require a status update about > related incubating projects in the quarterly board report.
+1. I'm operating under that already, though ApacheCon meant I screwed up and didn't nudge Agila into providing a report. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
