On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 18:27 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: > > Adam can certainly speak to the technical aspects of this than I can, > but AJAX certainly causes one to rethink the traditional client/server > boundary, in fact it tends to blur it. One can pick off small pieces > and say this definately belongs on the server, and that could ship with > eclipse, but there are also gray area pieces that we could pick a spot > based on our current understanding, but over time or with the inclusion > of new members and their points of view, our understanding may shift. > It would be advantageous if everything were licensened identically so > that such decisions could be made on a purely technical basis, and not > based on other considerations.
+1. > Life is hard enough as is. :) > P.S. If this isn't complicated enough, there is a third party: Mozilla > involved. At least there the line seems somewhat clearer. Are they contributing code and/or committers too? Or did you mean in the sense that the proposed project depends on XUL and its runtime? (Is that a Java thing BTW or is there a plan to do some JNI bridge to it from Eclipse WTP?) Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
