David Crossley wrote: [...]
The note that you have patched below is something that is listed under the "Resolved Issues" section. In my opinion that stuff should have been long ago moved to another file because it is old resolved issues. Those notes are not completely relevant now.
David, thanks for the feedback! I'm not sure I understand exactly what you mean. (Or maybe I just misunderstand the purpose of the Resolved Issues section.) Are you saying that the guidelines listed in the section may not be relevant anymore, perhaps because they have been superseded by new ones? If so, I would certainly agree that they should be removed. In addition, I would argue that a better place for keeping track of Incubator issues (both resolved and pending) is in Jira. The status file could then simply include a couple of links to Jira queries, one for all resolved issues and another for all pending issues: Pending issues: http://tinyurl.com/d3qwr Resolved issues: http://tinyurl.com/7d2c3
Lets backup a bit. You have raised two completely separate issues in the one email ... 1) The STATUS file for the Incubator project as a whole is way out-of-date and is confusing. 2) The requirements for each incubating project to declare their status, are misleading and confusing. These should be treated as two separate email topics.
Perhaps. I presented (2) as evidence of (1). In any case how do you suggest I change the patch? Remove the whole Resolved Issues section? Thanks Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]