Hi, On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 06:42 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > My point here is not that the above is wrong. My point is simply that > these issues are hard. > > Nor do I mean to single out classpath. The ASF, for example, takes > equal care in evaluating dependencies, ensuring that projects that may > wish to make use our work are able to do so. > > I suspect that the only robust solution to this will be to do the hard > work to make the various license compatible with one another.
Agreed on all points! I hope for harmony we can build consensus to use distribution terms that are both acceptable to the GNU community and projects which need to be able to be used in larger works distributed under the GPL and to the Apache community and projects which need to be able to be used in larger works distributed under the ASL. At the same times we must certainly attack the larger GPL/ASL issue. And I do hope we will be able to finally solve those since most of them are just legal technicalities and misunderstandings/misinterpretations (blown way out of proportion imho). Cheeers, Mark -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
