Noel,
To keep this discussion honest and open, I would appreciate if we could dissociate it from the particular case of Logging Services. I am happy to discuss whatever questions or comments you might have on LS on a separate thread. Is that OK with you?
At 04:38 PM 3/14/2005, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ceki Gülcü wrote: > I don't think the LS PMC could take over log4x code if the > current contributors stopped working on it.
(a) In what what is the Logging PMC managing the project? What makes log4__ part of Logging other than a common-ish API? (b) What about community development?
As a general rule, developing community is essential to the long-term viability of a project. And in the case of Loggging, it sounds as if you've really got an ontological collection of otherwise unrelated projects, which at the least means that each needs community development.
Dw addressed the rest of your issues, and I'm in agreement with him, so I'll leave his words to stand.
> What do people involved with several different projects have to say > on the matter?
Whatever they wish to say. One thing that I like about the Incubator is that it provides a focal point for discussing ASF practices.
--- Noel
-- Ceki Gülcü
The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
