Sorry about delay - on the road this week...
On Oct 4, 2004, at 2:29 PM, Julian wrote:
Geir,
Thanks for the response. Could you clarify a few more things for me?
The core engine is simple J2SE, depending on a set of services to provide functionality.So how hard would it be to make the system J2EE compliant?
Depends what you mean by "J2EE complaint". I use the core engine Gluecode's commercial product, which is J2EE. I don't think it's hard. JMS for the message pump, SLSBs for the services, and will do EJBs for persistence.
I don't think it's hard :)
3) Is there a graphical process designer?
We have one in our commercial product, and will not be giving that to the ASF. However, that means that there's plenty of room in the project for one :) I'm totally +1 for seeing one created here in the project.sorry to hear that...it seems like this would really help foster adoption especially since the flow lanuage is not standards based. any chances of changing your mind ;) ?
No :)
I must admit I find the jBPM server very attractive and am curious why one should choose this over jBPM. Could you help me out with some differentiating points?
I don't want to do that :) Look at both, and choose which you want to use. jBPM is more mature, certainly, but Agaila presents quite a bit of opportunity to shape into what's new and current. Choose what makes you happy.
Otherwise thanks a lot! I can't wait to take a look at the code.
-Julian
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
