Ceki Gülcü wrote:
At 11:49 AM 1/12/2004 +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Ceki Gülcü wrote: ...
From what I understand so far, I can't see any advantages for *log4net* to come through the Incubator instead of LS.
http://incubator.apache.org/faq.html#does_project_X_really_need_Incubation http://incubator.apache.org/faq.html#can_Incubation_be_skipped
http://incubator.apache.org/faq.html#project_XXX_makes_no_mention_of_Incubator
That does not really answer my question. On the contrary, it tends to confirm my fears.
You are talking to the Apache Incubator Project: we are here to make sure that certain things are done. Asking us not to do them is at least wierd.
We are here because this Project was created by the board to do certain things, not because we like having to check projects (the "can_Incubation_be_skipped" faq was written by a board member BTW).
If you have problems with having to go through the Incubator, and don't understand why a central project clearing house is needed, we cannot be of help in this, contact the board.
If instead you want to make this transition as fast and seamless as possible, just ask.
For one, start filling (or make others fill in) in a copy of the following for each project:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/site/projects/incubation-status-template.cwiki?view=markup
You have karma for it, go ahead. If others want to help you on this, just tell us, they will get karma too.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
