On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 19:11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 18:30, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > > Why are sites being forced to check in generated sites?
> >
> > Because that is what infrastructure has asked. The rest of your points are
> > all perfectly valid. My best understanding is summarized here:
> >
> >
> > http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > pache.org&msgNo=5207
> >
> > But this really is an infrastructure issue, since that is from where the
> > request comes. There are people, like Stefano, working to change the site
> > publication system. I'm sure that your participation would be welcomed.
>
> Why do we need grand site publications schemes? Geronimo is using Maven
> and it's trivial to site:deploy. Why is it strictly the duty of
> infrastructure to restore the site in the case of disaster? I'm sure
> someone from a project would gladly work with infrastructure to restore
> their site in case of a problem. Why does there need to be these grand
> schemes for infrastructure and site publication?
>
> The people in the specific projects have the knowledge about their site
> publication mechanisms and in cooperation with people from
> infrastructure I guarantee you a site would go quickly in the event
that should be: a site would go up quickly in the event something
tanked.
> something tanked.
>
> > -- Noel
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org
In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
-- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
