Spelling of participate is also wrong on the pages. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
news <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/10/2003 04:39:31 PM: > David Jencks wrote: > > > This is pretty nice looking and better than what I could do in a finite > > amount of time:-) > > :-) > > > A couple of comments, I apologize that they are somewhat negative. > > Hey, if they were only positive they would not be needed ;-) > > > -- The material in the left sidebar seems to me to change randomly > > depending on which page I'm on. The result is that I think the site is > > a disorganized maze. I don't know how these sidebars are generated, > > but if they were all the same or all the same for a given tab it would > > be much less confusing for me. > > This is wierd... I mean, when I click on all the links on teh left > navigation, I always get a page that has the same navigation... wait... > you mean that STATUS pages, right? Yup, that's wrong, gotta fix it :-) > Any other page other than /projects/** that generates wierd navigation? > > > --Perhaps this is covered in your request for a better boilerplate > > status template, but I can't discern how the alleged STATUS file is > > intended to relate to the STATUS web page linked to from the > > list-of-projects page. > > I agree, it has to be redone. > > > My impression from loosely following this list > > is that the STATUS file for a podling is supposed to be plain text > > The source is plain text, but Forrest is able to render it as HTML. > > Example: > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/incubator/site/projects/altrmi.cwiki? > rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup > > renders as > > http://www.apache.org/~nicolaken/whiteboard/incubator-draft-new- > site/projects/altrmi.html > > > and > > confine itself to noting which of the steps shown in the STATUS web > > page have been passed, which have problems, and which have not yet been > > attempted. > > Correct, that's the idea. > > > Again, my impression is that any information on the actual > > development state of the project (such as most of the geronimo status > > email) is supposed to be elsewhere, such as on the projects' web site. > > Hmmm, well you are correct on saying that this page should contain only > *incubation* status, so the boilerplate page itself must change, but I > still think that adding there the project reports is a good thing > nevertheless. > > > If indeed the official cvs STATUS page is supposed to be plain text, > > all the html seems redundant and confusing. > > Hmmm... maybe it's just the current page contents. > > > If the idea is to render > > an xml status document into html, putting a few "answers" into the html > > would make the intent much clearer. > > Ok. > > > Many thanks for working to make the incubation process clearer and more > > visible. > > And many thanks for helping in making it better :-) > > I'll note on this list when a new boilerplate status is ready, so you > can help me on that one later. Thanks. > > -- > Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - verba volant, scripta manent - > (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
