Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:...
I noticed in the new version that Drafts now takes a reader to the Wiki, and there is a "Final Drafts" subsection of the main incubation pages.
Is this giving the Wiki pages a more official status than previously?
Nope, I just prefer to say "drafts" than "wiki" as it describes what it contains rather than how it's written.
I kind of like the idea of a Drafts section, where documents close to completion go, with maybe a cover page that discusses the reason for the drafts section and points to the Wiki with a clear statement that this is where absolute first cuts get created.
On my HD I have renamed "Final Drafts" as "Incubation RFC" (Request for Comment), as they are something that we are building upon.
If "drafts" is a too strong term we can use another one, the important thing is that it describes that there we have docs that are not endorsed in any way.
I also noted when I looked that the status section talks about a Sponsor. Should we talk about both the Sponsor and the Sponsoring Entity (to keep the terminology in line with documentation)?
We have to redo all project status sections. Any idea about how to show a project incubation status better?
Having said that, I like the layout (but then I already know Forrest, so I like it from that perspective too :>).
:-)
I'll commit later today the newest layout so we can finally move there the site and start working on it together.
In the meantime is anyone can post examples of how we can make project incubation status pages, one page per project, it would be really great.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
