Sam Ruby wrote: > > > I'll answer that as best I can. Those that wish to follow along, may > wish to refer to http://incubator.apache.org/process.html. > > Entry: > > * A group external to the foundation (IBM) wants to donate > an existing code base to the Foundation. Additionally ,an > existing (sub)project (Jakarta/Jetspeed) wants to incorporate > this codebase and buid a community around it. > > Process: > > 1. All software in this codebase has had its copyright assigned to > the ASF. The secretary of the ASF has acknowledged receipt of > this copyright assignment. > > 2. All software in this codebase is now licensed under the Apache > license. This license is present in every source file in cvs. > > * All contributors have faxed in Contributor License Agreements. > The secretary has acknowledged receipt of these agreements. > > * The community has adopted the Apache voting rules and is otherwise > following the Apache guidelines > > * The community is incorporated within the existing jakarta and > jetspeed 'steering committees'. > > * The exit strategy for the podling has been defined as jakarta-pluto. > > 1. The Jakarta PMC has voted to accept this conditional upon > successful incubation. > 2. Time frame: TBD > 3. Graduation requirements: TBD > > As to the two TBD's above, these depend on the definition of the > incubation phases... > Thanks for the info, Sam.
I asked this mainly because of the wiki entry (http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?PlutoProposal) where some people showed there interest in Pluto (or in the proposal) and most of them are not aware of the current state. And I was just wondering why this is the case. Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
