Is it better for apache.org projects to use the same collaboration tools,
or should each be allowed to choose their own?
Brian
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:03:32 +0100
From: James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [general] JIRA bug, patch & feature request tracker available
On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 12:52 am, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
>
> Is there a reason why the bugzilla installation on nagoya.apache.org
> isn't
> considered? It's used by a lot of other apache projects...
bugzilla was considered but is not the most easy to use or attractive
piece of software. JIRA absolutely rocks - people really love using it.
Anyone who's used it in earnest for a few hours usually doesn't want go
back.
e.g. have a little surf around the Maven issues...
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10030
See how simple & easy it is to see stuff & how lovely it all looks.
They both solve the same problem but using JIRA rather than bugzilla is
a bit like moving to Java from C, once you've tasted the good life you
don't want to go back.
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
