Hi The following text in the introduction section 4334 for NETCONF Call Home [RFC8071 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8071>], and 6513 for NETCONF over Transport Layer Security (TLS) [RFC7589 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7589>][I-D.ietf-netconf-over-tls13 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-over-tls13-04>].
However, many of these assignments are for a transport protocol (i.e., UDP) for which the requesting application does not apply. Also, many of the assignments are for protocols that are not deployed and were tagged as Historic: [RFC4743 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4743>] and [RFC4744 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4744>]. This document de-assigns these unused port numbers. These two ports are mentioned here but based on the rest of the document I don’t see why Roni On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 at 9:15 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Roni, > > Thank you for the review. > > > The introduction section mentions ports 4334 and 6513 as candidates > > for release but the IANA considerations section do not mention them. > > Why are they in the introduction if not released? > > Can you please clarify which part of the text you are referring to? > > The only mention I see is the one where we list current assignments, which > is OK. > > Thanks. > > Cheers, > Med (as author) > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : Roni Even via Datatracker <[email protected]> > > Envoyé : lundi 7 juillet 2025 07:20 > > À : [email protected] > > Cc : [email protected]; last- > > [email protected]; [email protected] > > Objet : draft-ietf-netconf-port-numbers-03 ietf last call Genart > > review > > > > > > Document: draft-ietf-netconf-port-numbers > > Title: NETCONF Transport Port Numbers > > Reviewer: Roni Even > > Review result: Ready with Issues > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by > > the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like > > any other last call comments. > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw > > iki.ietf.org%2Fen%2Fgroup%2Fgen%2FGenArtFAQ&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.b > > oucadair%40orange.com%7Ca35a4424051b45edc24108ddbd15eb6b%7C90c7a20af > > 34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638874624028652238%7CUnknown%7CTWF > > pbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiI > > sIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4Tks3oXGIpS%2F6 > > 3DjgKwLxnZzPEfW0eg5u2GdCQiO9tA%3D&reserved=0>. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-netconf-port-numbers-03 > > Reviewer: Roni Even > > Review Date: 2025-07-06 > > IETF LC End Date: 2025-07-15 > > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > > > Summary: > > The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with a > > minor issue Major issues: > > > > Minor issues: > > The introduction section mentions ports 4334 and 6513 as candidates > > for release but the IANA considerations section do not mention them. > > Why are they in the introduction if not released? > > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez > recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
