Christer,

Thanks for the review.

Please see inline (prefixed VPB).

Regards,
-Pavan (on behalf of the authors)

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 5:52 AM Christer Holmberg via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:

> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-11
> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
> Review Date: 2025-02-18
> IETF LC End Date: 2025-02-07
> IESG Telechat date: 2025-02-20
>
> Summary: The document is well written, and easy to understand. However, I
> do
> have an editorial comment that I would like the authors to address.
>
> Major issues: N/A
>
> Minor issues: N/A
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> Currently the text says that a color tag can be used to associate a route
> or
> policy with an intent or objective. For readers not familiar it is a little
> unclear what "intent or objective" refers to. Perhaps adding a few words
> that
> it can be used to include/exclude certain type of traffic on a route, etc.
>

In ver 12 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color/12/),
we
added an example in the "Abstract" to clarify what "intent or objective"
refers
to. The "Introduction" section includes some text describing the use of
color
and references RFC9012 and RFC9256, which explain the use of color in
more detail.


>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list -- p...@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list -- gen-art@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gen-art-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to