On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 09:55:15AM -0500, Shumon Huque <shu...@gmail.com> wrote a message of 211 lines which said:
> In my view, this is not an erratum, which would imply there was an > error in RFC4035. That RFC was focussed on the originally envisioned > mode of DNSSEC, using pre-computed signatures, and did not take into > account online signatures Is it written somewhere? I always thought that RFC 4034/4035 allows pre-computed signatures but does not require them. Nothing in it seems to assume static signatures. IMHO, RFC 4034/4035 are quite neutral about static vs. dynamicc signatures. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list -- gen-art@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to gen-art-le...@ietf.org
