Hi Paul, thank you for your thorough review and helpful suggestion. I agree with you and removed the sentence altogether. I uploaded the new version -11 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam/>.
Regards, Greg On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 9:52 AM Paul Kyzivat <pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-10 > Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat > Review Date: 2024-08-27 > IETF LC End Date: TBD > IESG Telechat date: TBD > > Summary: > > This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should > be fixed before publication. > > NIT: > > Section 1.1.1 includes the following statement: > > "The term "BIER OAM" used in this document interchangeably with longer > version "set of OAM protocols, methods, and tools for BIER layer"." > > But BIER is not used anywhere else in the document. Hence I think you > can remove this. If you choose to retain it, then it needs to be defined. > > Otherwise this document seems ready to go. > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list -- gen-art@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to gen-art-le...@ietf.org
