> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> Section 1.4 describes the change regarding the KEY field in the
> pk-HSS-LMS-HashSig definition to reflect "no ASN.1 wrapping for the public
> key". I am not an expert in this domain, but would like to know what are the
> reasons behind removing the ASN.1 wrapping? Does RFC8708 imply ASN.1 wrapping?

Linda:

Experience from the hackathon shows it is better without the wrapping.

Russ
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list -- gen-art@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gen-art-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to