Dear Dan sorry to be late on your review
Le mer. 5 juin 2024 à 17:59, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> a écrit : > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review result: Ready with Issues > > This is an Early Review of draft-ietf-6lo-prefix-registration-02, at the > request of the WG chair, prior to the WGLC. > > This document updates a number of IPv6 Neighbor Discovery and 6LoWPAN > extensions RFCs to enable a node that owns or is directly connected to a > prefix > to register that prefix to neighbor routers. The registration indicates > that > the registered prefix can be reached via the advertising node without a > loop. > It also extends three Routing Protocols for LLNs RFCs. > > The document is Ready With (a few) Issues that can be clarified during the > WGLC. As it stands, the document can go to WGLC, and these comments can be > dealt with during the WGLC process. > > My comments: > > 1. I am not sure about this statement being in the right place in the 2.2 > Requirements section > > > In addition, the terms "Extends" and "Amends" are used as per > [I-D.kuehlewind-update-tag] section 3. > > We are dealing with Requirements and referencing an I-D seems odd. > > Yes, I was told to use that header title for BCP 14. Not sure what "Requirements" means there > 2. For clarity, please expand / explain in 2.4 the following terms: EARO, > DAO, > TIO, RTO > > done > 3. With all due respect to ASCII art, Figure 1 is not clear. Is there any > difference between an 'o' and a 'z'? > added z : wireless link, direct L2 connection o : node > 4. There is an 'Extending 7400' section, but RFC 7400 is not included in > the > list on the header, or mentioned in the first paragraph. > > done > 5. I appreciate the Backward Compatibility section, but I am wondering > whether > there are any compatibility issues related to scalability or provisioning > that > an operator or user should be aware about when deploying the newly defined > extensions. Maybe there is room for an Operational Considerations section, > or > for a sub-section in the Backwards Compatibility section. > > Will consider this for the next rev! many thanks, Dan Pascal -- Pascal
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list -- gen-art@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to gen-art-le...@ietf.org
