Hi Russ, Thank you for the review.
Regarding the updating of an IRTF document we're going to go with whatever the considered opinion of the IESG/IRTF is. Meanwhile, thanks for the nit. Cheers, Rick On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 16:12, Russ Housley via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review result: Not Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. > > Document: draft-ietf-dtn-ipn-update-11 > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review Date: 2024-06-12 > IETF LC End Date: Already complete > IESG Telechat date: 2024-06-20 > > > Summary: Not Ready > > > Major Concerns: > > RFC 7116 is an Informational RFC, and this document, if approved, will > be published an an RFC on the standards track. It is very unusual for > a standards-track RFC to update an Informational RFC. I suggest that > this document and a companion document ought to obsolete RFC 7116, where > the companion document separately handles all of the non-ipn topics in > RFC 7116. The companion document can be an informational RFC. > > > Minor Concerns: > > None > > > Nits: > > Section 5.5: s/security source EID for/security source for/ > > > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list -- gen-art@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to gen-art-le...@ietf.org
