Thanks, Stewart. Agree with both points. Regards, Brian
On 6/3/24 10:47 AM, Stewart Bryant via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-pim-3376bis-10 Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2024-06-03 IETF LC End Date: 2024-06-06 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary:This is a well written document with just a couple of small things to look at. Major issues:None Minor issues: This is a standards track document so I would expect the IANA Considerations to be standards track. In the IANA section the text says: All IGMP types described in this document are managed via [I-D.ietf-pim-3228bis]. However I-D.ietf-pim-3228bis is given as an informational reference. I would have expected it to be a normative reference. Nits/editorial comments: The keyword (RFC2119) boilerplate use is the old version and not the modern version. This should be changed.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list -- gen-art@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to gen-art-le...@ietf.org
