Hi Ken, Thanks for the clarification I have no more qusetions Roni On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 15:04 Ken Murchison <mu...@fastmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Roni, > > Thank you for the review. Responses inline below. > > > On 4/8/24 7:26 AM, Roni Even via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ> > <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. > > Document: draft-murchison-rfc8536bis-?? > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date: 2024-04-08 > IETF LC End Date: 2024-04-14 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > The document is ready for publication as a standard track rfc with a nit > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > In appendix B2 I noticed that the order of ut/local and standard/wall has > changed comparing to RFC8536 but did not see any mention of the change in > appendix D. Is this on purpose? > > > This change was part of the following bullet point: > > - Addressed errata [Err6426 > > <https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/export/125234b0-57c4-4df6-8760-e54b74ff7e76/draft-murchison-rfc8536bis.html#Err6426> > ] and [Err6757 > > <https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/export/125234b0-57c4-4df6-8760-e54b74ff7e76/draft-murchison-rfc8536bis.html#Err6757> > ] as well as several other errors in the examples. > > > > -- > Kenneth Murchison > Senior Software Developer > Fastmail US LLC > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
