Thanks.
Robert Sparks via Datatracker writes:
Nits/editorial comments:
At:
A few IMAP client maintainers have asked for ways to use features
that are available in JMAP without having to drop their expensively
tested IMAP code.
Why does this need to be in the document at all?
It answers the first question people ask — "why would a client want to use
both?"
It will not
age well. Consider just removing it.
I did, and added "or …" to the the abstract instead, which now ends
"intended for clients that want to migrate gradually to JMAP or use JMAP
extensions within an IMAP client."
Arnt
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
